 |
A
committee,
to be appointed by Uitzicht, of three experts will decide
whether your request
for a subsidy meets the
types of research
and preconditions
and thus
qualifies for UitZicht.
If this is not the case, the request will be returned.
This committee also appoints
the scientific experts (reviewers). |
 |
Three
reviewers evaluate the scientific quality of your request. |
 |
A panel from
Viziris evaluates the practical relevance of your
request from the perspective of people with visual impairment. |
 |
There
is an opportunity to give a written reaction to the evaluations in March.
|
 |
Your
subsidy request, the evaluations and your reaction will be sent to the
funds of your choice. They examine whether your request suits their own
purposes and policies. In most cases they draw up a shortlist containing the
applications to be rewarded and the concerning amounts. |
 |
At
the end of May there is a coordination meeting attended by most of the
funds. The main goal of this meeting is to avoid overfunding. |
 |
After this meeting the
separate funds will make their final decision. |
 |
The individual funds will inform you
whether you application is being honoured and up to which amount in June. |
 |
When the number of reviewers is more than 25, their names will be published
on this website. The members of the panel from Viziris remain
anonymous. |